PatchesAndForks/rome
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fixed some errors from site transformation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Martin Kurz 2013-10-04 20:54:12 +02:00
parent 7325f5fd8b
commit 929a2c3870
4 changed files with 9 additions and 66 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
src/site/apt/ROMEDevelopmentProcess.apt
View file

@ -8,11 +8,8 @@
ROME Development Process
We're welcoming our first external developer, {{{http://www.mackmo.com/nick/blog/}Nick Lothian}} today, so we thought it would be good to set a few basic rules for this project. We don't want to be too formal, since we're still alpha, and trust our developer's common sense to "do the right thing".
* Please before commiting anything send an email in the rome developer lists to explain what you want to do
* When you create some new code, please javadoc it, and unit tests are welcome

2
src/site/apt/ROMEDevelopmentProposals/ROMEFeatureRequests.apt
View file

@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
ROME Feature Requests
* <<BUG:>> com.sun.syndication.io.impl.DateParser:Date parseW3CDateTime(String) incorrectly uses a comma (",") rather than a decimal (".") to delimit the seconds from miliseconds. The correct format can be found on {{{http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE\-datetime}http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE\-datetime}}. The bug is on line 170 (version 0.8). The fix is to replace the line with this: <<<int secFraction \= pre.indexOf(".");>>> \-\- JLP 9/4/2006
* <<BUG:>> Atom 1.0 parsing uses wrong Content types. "text", "html", "xhtml" do not match what is parse from the content elements. Subsequently, the content elements always have a null value \- no way to get content.

9
src/site/apt/ROMEDevelopmentProposals/index.apt
View file

@ -8,17 +8,12 @@
ROME Development Proposals
*ROME Development Proposals
Link to new ROME feature and release proposals here.
*ROME2 Proposal
* {{{../ROMEROADMAPProposed.html}ROME ROADMAP (Proposed) (rome)}}
* {{{./ROME21stProposalJune10th2006NOTCURRENT.html}ROME2 first proposal }} (Jun/10/2006).
@ -29,9 +24,7 @@ ROME Development Proposals
*Requests for Enhancement (RFEs)
* {{{https://rometools.jira.com/browse/ROME}Issue tracking system}} \- file RFEs here
* {{{https://github.com/rometools/rome/issues}Issue tracking system}} \- file RFEs here
* {{{./ROMEFeatureRequests.html}Feature Requests}} \- old feature request page

61
src/site/apt/ROMEROADMAPProposed.apt
View file

@ -8,69 +8,24 @@
ROME ROADMAP (Proposed)
*----+--+
| |
version
||
changes
|
*----+--+
|
1.1
|
Omnibus release with ROME patches + JDK 1.5 changes.
|
|| version || changes |
*----+--+
|
1.5
|
Migration to org.rometools (light break compat)
|
| 1.1 | Omnibus release with ROME patches + JDK 1.5 changes.|
*----+--+
|
1.6
|
Elimination of Synd* interfaces and Synd*Impl in favor of base objects (break compat)
|
| 1.5 | Migration to org.rometools (light break compat)|
*----+--+
|
1.7
|
Introduction of "Rome" class with pass-by-ref context for modules
|
| 1.6 | Elimination of Synd* interfaces and Synd*Impl in favor of base objects (break compat)|
*----+--+
|
1.8
|
Addition of a factory by package for the Rome class.
|
| 1.7 | Introduction of "Rome" class with pass-by-ref context for modules|
*----+--+
|
1.9
|
JSR-330   remix of the Rome class and all deps.
|
| 1.8 | Addition of a factory by package for the Rome class.|
*----+--+
| 1.9 | JSR-330   remix of the Rome class and all deps.|
*----+--+
*Old Development Proposals
* {{{./ROMEDevelopmentProposals/ROME22ndProposalJuly18th2006CURRENT.html}ROME2 2nd Proposal (July 18th 2006) CURRENT (rome)}}
* {{{./ROMEDevelopmentProposals/ROME21stProposalJune10th2006NOTCURRENT.html}ROME2 1st Proposal (June 10th 2006) NOT CURRENT (rome)}}